No. 3 Stanley Rehab

Last week, Josh Clark put out his latest tools for sale list and there was a pretty sad lookin’ No. 3 Stanley up for sale.  I’d been lookin’ for a smaller plane and have been having a lot of fun rehabing planes.  In typical Josh fashion this “good user” showed up and was indeed a good user.

So here’s the before and after photos and a gallery of how I got there.  I installed a Ron Hock plane blade and chip breaker as well as a new handle from Hardware City Tools (Bill Rittner).  I have a couple of his handles on my Veritas planes.

This plane has some significant pitting at the toe and in a couple of places along the side.  But I just need a good user since I’m not a collector.

After

Here’s the gallery:

It turned out the be one sweet little worker.

This entry was posted in tool, tool repair and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to No. 3 Stanley Rehab

  1. joemcglynn says:

    The #3 came out great Marilyn! I know every time I use a plane that I had to restore I always feel really good about the tool.

    • Marilyn says:

      Thanks! I’m looking forward to putting it to good use.

      Yeah!I agree. Its really fun to use something that someone used long ago. And I’m always amazed at how comfortable these planes feel.

  2. Bill Rittner says:

    Nice work Marilyn. That will be a great user. The pitting won’t have any effect on the usefulness of the plane, but be sure to keep the pits well coated with paste wax or they will keep rusting.

  3. Marilyn says:

    Here’s another good suggestion: “Oh, and don’t think of the pits as defects- they are wax holders. Fill the pits in the sole with candle wax and it’ll keep the plane sole lubricated and running smooth for hours ;)” Josh

    • joemcglynn says:

      You _could_ repair the pits. The easy way would be to use Lab Metal (http://www.alvinproducts.com/). It would be primarily a cosmetic repair, anything on the sole would probably wear away pretty quickly.

      Plan B would be to have the pitted areas build up with cast iron welding rod. That would be nearly invisible and every bit as durable as the original casting.

      But filling them with wax is a good thought 🙂

      • Marilyn says:

        Hmm .. decisions, decisions.

      • Bill Rittner says:

        Anything can be repaired, at a price. We often need an inexpensive user tool, and vintage tools can be a good choice to that end. However, one must know when to stop or the cost can quickly get out of hand. Welding those pits could cause serious distortion in that old gray iron casting. May I recommend leaving them as is. The
        pits tell a story of neglect and your quality restoration tells one of caring.

      • Marilyn says:

        “The pits tell a story of neglect and your quality restoration tells one of caring.” Ah! Well said. I like it! I was leaning that way and now I can do that without regret. Thanks!

  4. Collin says:

    Beautiful restoration! I consistently fight rust here in Maryland too, and I have found that a couple coats of T-9 Boeshield followed by a coat of wax does wonders on all my tools with exposed metal faces (even the ones with lots of pitting). I have also, like you, discovered the wonders of Evaporust, hooray for modern chemistry!

    • Marilyn says:

      Thanks! And Yes! I use Boeshield and was on my cast iron table (bandsaw etc.) and love it.

      I added your site to my blog roll. Great site with a lot or great info! Thanks for reading and commenting so I could find it.

  5. billlattpa says:

    I have a 100+ year old #7 that I came across in very good shape. I got a nice edge on the iron and the sole was very good to begin with. I’m having a little trouble with the blade adjustment. Any suggestions would be more than welcome. Before I forget the plane looks pretty awesome.

  6. dieta says:

    I’ve restored a few planes and I try to make them look like they came out of the tool box of a mechanic who used and cared for his tools. Shiney, showroom new isn’t really approriate. On rusted surfaces, I use a solid rubber block with grit embedded, Sandflex is the name from Woodcraft (and others) ( http://www.woodcraft.com/family.aspx?familyid=7329 ). I can control just how much “patina” I want to see. It doesn’t leave black mess like sandpaper. You can look up electrolysis, but it is messy process, and leaves you with a gray steel. It does cut the red rust, not the black pitting. To work properly, the mating surfaces on the frog and body need to be resonably smooth. The top of the frog needs to be reasonably smooth so that the cutter blade will slide smoothly when adjusted. Once you’ve done that, any further smoothing is for aesthetics. So, to answer your question, the scotchbrite won’t hurt anything, but be sure that you will be happy with the appearance of the surface it leaves. After cutting down to fresh steel, I would definately protect the metal with paste wax. I use Johnson’s. And, if the black paint “japanning” on the inside of the body is a bit rough, you can make it look a bit better by waxing the first coat with liquid black shoe polish. Do clean up the wood handles too, when that rosewood is finished and shining–looks great. Wax helps them too. To use the plane, the blade must be razor sharp at the proper angle. Again you can find help on this courtesy of Google.

  7. Pingback: To keep or not to keep .. that is the question. « She Works Wood

  8. Pingback: Restoring E. Sarjeant’s Hand Planes | She Works Wood

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s